Kai Bojens via Exim-users <[email protected]> (Mi 17 Jul 2024 08:43:00 CEST): > Am 15.07.24 um 19:43 schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim-users: > > > Sounds like they changed what their output looks like. > > DO tell us if you get a response from the rspamd guys, > > and feel free to open an issue on bugs.exim.org > > (since they are unlikely to retreat). > > The rspamd developer answered: > > "Exim support of Rspamd is just broken I would say. Nobody actually takes > care about legacy SA protocol support and nobody should (as we have …
I remember that we had trouble with rspamd already before, as it used to
have an uncommon understanding of how (half open/closed) connections
should be handled. (In case I remember correctly). So my personal
feeling is, that rspamd understands itself as the single source of truth
about networking (among other things.)
But I still think, we should try supporting it. (Or even better, find a
way to use the milter protocol to interface with other externals too.)
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## [email protected] ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
