On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 12:11:15 -0400, you wrote: >On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Tom Berger wrote: >> On Mit, 21 Apr 1999, you wrote: / Am Mit, 21 Apr 1999 schrieben Sie: >> > On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Tom Berger wrote: >> > > Hi! >> > > Boy, what a mess... >> > > I installed/upgraded gtk 1.2.0 and glib 1.2.0. The gtk-packages >> > > (libs+devel) were vanilla Redhat rpms, glib had to be compiled because the >> > > RH lib-rpm is linked against some strange glibc version (pre-dependent >> > > libraries have a CC2 tag *shrug*, devel installed fine, though). >> > > Trouble is I don't get *anything* compiled which is linked against gtk >> > > 1.2.0. >> > >> > [ big snip ... sorry Tom! ] >> > >> > > Last chance would be compiling gtk by myself, too. Duh... Is there anyone >> > > in here who got *all* the rpms installed (gtk/gtk-devel, glib/glib-devel) >> > > and has since then successfully compiled a source against them? If so, >> > > would you please tell me as exactly as possible which versions you did >> > > use? >> > >> > Here are the packages that I downloaded from the GNOME mirrors. I _have_ >> > been able to compile things against these packages. Good luck! >> > >> > >> [big snip ... sorry Steve! :-)] >> >> Thanks a lot! BTW: do you have a T1 or are you affiliated with one of the >> GNOME guys? Looks like a monster download... > >Heh, nope! It's just me and my little 56k modem. From looking at the >backups, the whole thing is around 30M of download. Not TOO bad. Of >course, you probably don't need to grab ALL of them if you're not interested >in running GNOME. If you just want to be able to compile glib/gtk+ >programs, you could probably get away with downloading the glib-1.2, glib10, >gtk+-1.2, gtk+10 and the appropriate -devel packages. > >Good luck! Already done that, np compiles like a charm now :-). Well, 30 MB are not that bad, it's less than MS Exploder 5... What about stability and general usuability of GNOME, is it worth dl'ing? Regards tom -- even sillier: http://www.nightflight.com/htdocs/darwin.html Tom Berger, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
