On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> >%_See I object to this statement. All they did was re-package the RPM's
> with the name mandrake. They really didn't do anything except maybe
> re-write the install, that's it. I don't know why people are praising
> them. They can't even fix the bugs.....
>
Perhaps when they STARTED, that's all they did. AFAIK, they
have now rewritten a large number of the packages or at
least recompiled the source for Pentium or better.
BTW, while we're having a mutual "bitch" session, would you
PLEASE remember to turn off your HTML posts? It's an
unnecessary waste of bandwidth!
John
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Kit Ngan
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ... Axalon Bloodstone
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Andrew Morton
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Harald Schreiber
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ... Gael Duval
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fi... Mohammad R. Salehpour, Ph.D.
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Arandir
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Al Smith
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Max Klohn
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Al Smith
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? David Comeau
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ... Al Smith
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fi... Lee Burnside
- RE: [expert] Why are bugs no... Ken Wilson
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs no... David Comeau
- RE: [expert] Why are bugs not fi... Ken Wilson
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ... Vincent Danen
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Al Smith
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Rudd-O
- Re: [expert] Why are bugs not fixed ? Al Smith
