Last time I tried to get on undernet I got a boot from the server I was
accessing because I don't run identd. :-)
I don't know why someone would want to give up their box as another
playground for script kiddies. I know they can do little or no damage
to a Linux box but they are a plague on the plethora of Windows users on
IRC. Unless you run it as a passworded server and only let trusted
users on. I don't know if any of the current nets will let you join
with a private server though.
Ken Wilson
First Law of Optimization: The speed of a nonworking program is
irrelevant
(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Aldrich
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 12:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] ircd requested
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Topic says it all. Now is your time to get input on which
> gets packaged..
> >
> > wOOp! You're going to package ircd? Cool... I tried to
> build an RPM for
> > it for a friend and it was way to hard with the pre-compile
> directives. I
> > tried with the undernet irc daemon tho.... are there more
> than that one to
> > choose from? Are you asking for which one you should package?
> >
> Hey, Axalon...how about UnRealIRC? A buddy of mine is
> running that and says it's pretty cool. :-) 'Course
> Undernet won't let you use it, but if you're running Linux,
> they don't want you either, I'm told... only BSD boxes! :-)
> John
>
