|
Ok, this is going to sound lame, but since I was
using OpenVMS for a while I'm not totally up on Linux..so if someone could fill
me in that would be great..
I installed Mandrake on my PII/300 and it works
great. On the Mandrake home page it says the Mandrake distro is the most
"user friendly" Linux and is a great workstation. However, if this is Red
Hat under the hood then why can't Mandrake be pushed for a server as well?
Installing Apache, QPopper, or whatever else isn't hard and I think Mandrake
would make an ideal box in that repect...any thoughts? If Mandrake was on
Alpha that would be even better..as the new Compaq Alpha machines are screaming
fast! The SpecFPU on a 21264/600mhz Alpha is triple a Pentium III.
You can get a Compaq Alpha 21264/2MB Cache SCSI server running Linux for less
than $4k. Throw Mandrake on their and you'd have a super-fast
server!
Mark
|
- Re: [expert] Mandrake as a Server? Mark Holloway
- Re: [expert] Mandrake as a Server? Mark Berry
- [expert] Slackware Vs Mandrake - Who is bette... Paul Hoy
- Re: [expert] Slackware Vs Mandrake - Who ... Jean-Michel Dault
- Re: [expert] Slackware Vs Mandrake - ... Ramon Gandia
- Re: [expert] Slackware Vs Mandrake - ... Palmer C Byrne, RAA
- Re: [expert] Slackware Vs Mandra... Denis Havlik
- [expert] KMAIL doesn't like ... Marco Fioretti
- Re: [expert] Slackware Vs Mandra... John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Slackware Vs Mandra... Jean-Michel Dault
- Re: [expert] Slackware Vs Mandrake - Who ... John Aldrich
