On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, you wrote:
>
> I fully agree. Some people use computers to get stuff done with. Not to learn
> how to adminstrate systems. If the answer is not readily available in the
> manuals at hand, it is only natural to ask the list. That is the purpose of
> these lists.
>
> If the Linux experts refuse to help the Linux newbies, then we fully deserve
> the labels of elitism and arrogance.
>
On the other hand, answering the same question 20 or 30
times can get a bit annoying. That's one reason we HAVE the
archives in the first place, is it not? Otherwise, what
reason IS there to keep the archives? I just nuked about 45
day's worth of read messages because my KMail was having
problems running out of memory....
John
- [expert] Using Mandra... Paul Hoy
- Re: [expert] Using Ma... timothylewis
- Re: [expert] Using Ma... Travis Fitch
- Re: [expert] Using Ma... chris faulkner
- [expert] redhat conve... Denis Havlik
- Re: [expert] Using Ma... Herman Van Keer (softouch)
- Re: [expert] Using Ma... Andrea Celli
- Re: [expert] FAQ or w... Tom Berger
- Re: [expert] FAQ or w... Herman Van Keer (softouch)
- Re: [expert] FAQ or w... Herman Van Keer (softouch)
- Re: [expert] FAQ or w... John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] FAQ or w... Tom Berger
- Re: [expert] FAQ or w... Tom Berger
- Re: [expert] FAQ or w... John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] FAQ or what? John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] FAQ or what? Steve Philp
- Re: [expert] FAQ or what? John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] FAQ or what? (Sylvain) Tom Berger
- Re: [expert] FAQ or what? Gordon von Miller
- Re: [expert] FAQ or what? John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] FAQ or what? (John) Tom Berger
