On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
> > Its actually in the faq for licq... you are going to have to
> > set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the directory with qt2.x in it, the only problem
> > 1.x and 2.x are both in /usr/lib, so what I did was download qt2.x tar,
> > compiled it myself and put it in its own dir /usr/local/lib/qt-2.0.2 and set
> > my LD_LIBRARY_PATH to that dir, all the sudden LICQ ran fine. The problem
> > you are getting is cause LICQ is finding 1.x versions of QT instead of 2.x
> > hence the undefined symbols. So you have to contain 2.x by itself, I am sure
> > there is mandrake way to do it, I just did it the easiest I could think of.
> >
> > Hope this helps
>
> Yeah, I figured that out after I poked around for a bit last night, and
> installed qt the old fashioned way too, Thanks anyway though ;-)
>
>
>
> >
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ 1796276
>
>
>
>
I've grabbed the qt2 tarball from troll.no and I've run into a fustercluck
of bugs in the code. I wish I knew more about C++ though; I'm guessing on
what to do to fix this trash.
--
Rich Clark
Sign the petition at http://www.libranet.com/petition.html
Help bring us more Linux Drivers
