Er, Linux was labeling FAT partitions as VFAT before FAT32 came along. If
VFAT supports FAT32, that's great (and it appears to; I just put ML 6.1 on
a box with a 4 GB FAT partition and it appears to read and wite it). But
VFAT also supports FAT16 partitions with long file names.
Perhaps I'm being overly pedantic here, but they appear to me to be
different.
I also found out that NT 4 with SP5 supports FAT32. Well, well, well.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 04:17:43PM -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
-> On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, you wrote:
-> > If you want data interchangeability, you could build a small FAT parking
-> > partition. However, of you want full access to the NT partition, you
-> > should format it for FAT16, NOT fat 32. Or do later versions of Linux
-> > support FAT32?
-> >
-> FAT32 == VFAT
-> John
--
-- C^2
No windows were crashed in the making of this email.
Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley
