For me, when it asks me to eject the disk to rescan, it actually goes
ahead and reject it and immediately re-reads it before I can even
re-insert the disk.
And then it fails with the same message again.
However, this problem may not relate to supermount; I get the same
problem when I try to erase a CD-RW drive without supermount (though
not for a CD-R).
On Wed, 08 Mar 2000, you wrote:
| Supermount works fine with my CD-RW. I've only burned one disk since I
| upgraded but I experienced no problems. I used cdrecord at the command line.
| The only thing it had to do was eject the drive once so it could rescan it or
| something like that.
|
| Richard
|
| On Tue, 07 Mar 2000, you wrote:
| > As I gather it, supermount works . . .
| >
| > .. . . but not for a CD-RW, and my only CD-ROM is a CD-RW.
| > ... . . but not for ext2 floppies, and I tried one of those second.
| > ... . . but not for an LS-120 drive (I don't have one of those, at least).
| > ... . . but not with filesystem of "auto" (which I happen to like).
| >
| > So my take is that it's not quite "ready for prime time," though if you
| > have a thoroughly conventional system which you use in a thoroughly
| > conventional way . . . well, then, you're running Windows, then, aren't
| > you? . . . I mean, then it would work for you.
| >
| > I have a somewhat unconventional system and I've been using Unixy
| > systems for nearly 20 years now and I found Supermount just got in
| > my way. YMMV.
--
I am "Brian, the man from babble-on" (Brian T. Schellenberger).
I can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I support http://www.eff.org & http://www.programming-freedom.org .
I boycott amazon.com. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazon.html .
