I just want to reemphasize that I wasn't intending to flame anyone. But my point remains. When linux was a totally ad-hoc thing, there was an excuse for this kind of thing. Now, with companies like mandrake building and shipping distros, I sometimes wonder if there is even a pretense at quality control. I don't think mandrake is any worse than redhat, caldera or whoever, and I don't expect bottomless, free maintenance, but I do expect something close to stable. I haven't tried 7.02, but from what I heard, the initial 7.0 was absolutely terrible, in terms of quality. I know there are limited man-hours to do a new release, but if I had a choice, I'd opt for some larger chunk to be spent on QA as opposed to neat new features. I haven't played with other distros before, so I have no idea how they stack up against mandrake on this issue.
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.02 is mes... Mike & Tracy Holt
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.02 is mes... Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.02 is mes... Tom Berkley
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.02 i... Wolfgang Bornath
- [expert] List email not ... Trevor Farrell
- Re: [expert] List em... Wolfgang Bornath
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.... Civileme
- Re: [expert] Mandrak... Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Man... Wolfgang Bornath
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.02 i... Dan Swartzendruber
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.... Dan Swartzendruber
- Re: [expert] Mandrak... ixsoft Softwareentwicklung und -vertrieb
- Re: [expert] Mandrak... Declan Moriarty
- Re: [expert] Man... Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Mandrak... Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.... Bug Hunter
- Re: [expert] Mandrak... Dan Swartzendruber
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.... Trevor Farrell
- Re: [expert] Mandrak... Michael Holt
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.02 is mes... Trevor Farrell
- Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.02 i... Bug Hunter
