Daniel Woods wrote:
>
> > Wayne wrote:
> > >
> > > Volker,
> > > the BJC-2000 and 3000 work fine with Linux. It provides driver for the 4000
> > > and 600, which are the same engines used for the above two printers. I
> > > installed a 2000 with no problems and someone else here has installed a 3000
> > > without any hassles.
> > <snip>
> >
> > I'd also like to say that my BJC-6000 works fine with the
> > 4000 driver.
> > Dana
>
> I've been wanting to get the BJC-6000 or BJC-6100 to replace my current
> BJC-4100. Will my BJC-4100 drivers work as well ? How *well* does the
> BJC-6000 actually work (ie: fully compliant) ? I had looked at the
> http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/pht/printer_list.cgi
> printer list website and it says BJC-6000 is only *partially* supported.
> The BJC-5000 is paperweight and the BJC-4000/4100 are fully supported.
>
> So is it worth buying the BJC-6000/6100 ?
> Any other experiences out there ?
>
> Thanks... Dan.
Yea, I had a 4200 that quit after about a year and a half.. My dad's
malfunctioned also.
I bought a HP 895 Cse that outperforms the Canons both speed and
quality.
I would buy an HP.. I'm using the HP 550c linux driver. Works nice.
Alan
--
================================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Coming to you from RedHat 6.2Beta and/or BeOS 4.5
===============================================================
