I feel like a AOL user few years ago, but I can resist to add my 'me
too!' to this. At first, I found Mandrake 7 to be a definitively hot
linux release. But all the little glitch here and there also made me
install back Mandrake 6. And I'm wondering if Red Hat 6.2 won't be ok,
after all...
Please, fix those pesky little things : Netscape on Linux is
definitively behind Netscape on Win* or even, - apologize -, MSIE. So
please, fix that kind of misbehaving B&W look 'n' feel and the kind of
bugs : it's hard to advocated Linux vs. Win2K in that kind of context...
;o)
Trevor Farrell wrote:
>
> When I first installed it, I really liked Mdk 7.0-2 - real nifty new
> installer, supermount, XFree3.3.6, the first graphical install to work
> with my SiS 6326 chip, ... Yes, I thought it was really nice. Then the
> cracks started to appear - sound card that worked under Ver 6 wouldn't
> install under 7, Netscape had yucky b&w icons, cd burner not linked
> properly, and wouldn't burn when it was, wheel mouse that wheeled
> without help under 6 didn't under 7, partitioning tool buggy, expert
> install option absolutely unusable - how the hell do you know what is
> selected and what isn't? - the "magic 50%" install rule - it only fills
> your partition to 50%, regardless of what you really wanted, ...
>
> Now, weeks later, some of the above are fixed and some aren't, but I put
> it down to my "el cheapo" buying - PCchips motherboard, ide cdrw, etc
> and lack of knowledge/skill - ie my fault...
>
> Today, I feel differently. We have had a Mdk 6 machine at work for
> some time, and its supervisor today decided to install 7.0-2 . He
> started by booting from a boot floppy, the install locked when it tried
> to initialize the CD. So I suggested that he set the BIOS to boot from
> CD (it was previously set to boot from the floppy, then the ide drive.)
> and this time the install went nicely, until he hit the expert select
> packages fiasco - he couldn't make any more sense of it than I could -
> so he cancelled that and started again, this time being careful not to
> select expert! It loaded the packages (why is Mandrake so slow doing
> this, compared to red hat?) and then locked up as it started the X
> configuration. Rebooted the machine, everything started up well, but no
> X. At this stage my colleague threw the ver 7 cd in the bin, and will be
> putting 6 back on the machine next week. (No - he doesn't want to know
> how to fix it, or what went wrong.)
>
> Also today, I installed the BeOS 5 (Personal Edition) operating system
> that I downloaded last night. It really just unpacked the files. I
> rebooted the machine, and hey! presto ... BeOS! Funny, video worked,
> sound worked, Cdrw burnt cd's, ... all with NO installation questions,
> NO how-to's, No hassles. OK - so there is nothing written for BeOS yet,
> and I'm not serious about keeping it, just curious, BUT, it proved you
> can write a hassle free installer THAT WORKS!
>
> OK - back to Linux - the current attitude that if something didn't work,
> it's because you didn't read the instructions or your hardware is faulty
> IS SIMPLY NOT ACCEPTABLE to me any more - If it doesn't work FIRST TIME
> it's because its broken, and needs fixing.
>
> The first Linux distribution that produces a hassle free installer that
> works (no if's, but's, or maybe's - I mean works - full stop!)
> WILL SUCCEED, all the rest will only be installed by enthusiasts (which
> I still count myself among) and are doomed to their rightful resting
> place in the garbage bin.
>
> Now, it's time for my big decision - Do I, like my colleague, consign
> the Ver 7 install I have spent so much time on to oblivion, and go back
> to Ver 6 because it worked, or do I persevere, and try to get 7 up and
> running properly, or, perhaps, do I try RedHat 6.2, or just wait for a
> distro with kernel 2.4 & XFree 4? I really don't know, and I really
> don't expect anyone else to decide for me, I just know that my
> perceptions of install problems will never be the same again.
