On Wed, 05 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> Seems pretty close to me. Why is it so funny?
>
> And is a nanosecond a millionth or a billionth ("thousand millionth"
> for our British friends, and perhaps for our European friends as
> well, I can't remember right now) of a second? I never can remember.
>
Well, according to their stats, it should be a LOT
closer, no?
John
- Re: [expert] time/date Lane Lester
- Re: [expert] time/date Charles Bennett
- Re: [expert] time/date John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] time/date Civileme
- Re: [expert] time/date George Czerw
- Re: [expert] time/date Mage Grimau
- Re: [expert] time/date (OT) John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] time/date (OT) Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] time/date (OT) John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] time/date (OT) Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] time/date (... John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] time/da... Leopold Palomo
- Re: [expert] time/date (OT) Wolfgang Bornath
- Re: [expert] time/date Lane Lester
- Re: [expert] time/date John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] time/date Civileme
- Re: [expert] time/date Alan Shoemaker
- Re: [expert] time/date Brian T. Schellenberger
