Civileme wrote: > Glyn Millington wrote: > > > > Wow! I tried this and it threw > > The kernel footprint is about 500K. This is not windows where it runs > about 4Mb (at least for NT) <SNIP> As it turned out, he had a motherboard that shared system memory with the onboard video. Linux puked because he used LILO to report more available memory than actually existed. -Stephen-
- [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnut Glyn Millington
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnut Dan Westlake
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnu... Glyn Millington
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old che... Civileme
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old... Stephen F. Bosch
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old... Glyn Millington
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - a... Dan Westlake
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - a... Stephen F. Bosch
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old che... Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old... Bug Hunter
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnut Wolfgang Bornath
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnu... Glyn Millington
- RE: [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnut Russ Johnson
- Re: [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnu... Glyn Millington
- RE: [expert] Missing RAM - an old chestnut fred . deklein
