On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> LOL!! I'm sorry but I just can't imagine a real windblows program that's
> stable. I've found four in six years that I consider reliable. I think
> it's kind of a sad epitaph for a OS that coulda, whoulda, shoulda been
> great, but failed miserably due to ego and greed, imho.
>
Look at Agent32. It's pretty stable. I have a hard time
crashing it.... 'course if I don't delete old messages it
DOES take a LONG time to compress the databases, but... :-)
John
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Michael Holt
- RE: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Russ Johnson
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Michael Holt
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Stephen F. Bosch
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Tom Berkley
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Vic
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Pj
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Pj
- [expert] joystick help John Aldrich
- [expert] joystick help ArMiSiS AiEoLn
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Bug Hunter
- Re: [expert] Wine Is Not an Emulator Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Tom Berkley
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Ron Stodden
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Ron Stodden
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Brian T. Schellenberger
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Pj
- Re: [expert] Office Suite for Linux Brian T. Schellenberger
