Matt Stegman wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, james.fogg wrote: > > BTW.. I have two machines that identify as -S model CPU-s (P133-S and > > P166-S). I think they are pre-MMX. Is there any significance to the S > > designation? > > Sorry, can't help you here. I have no idea what the S means. Could it be like the 486's ??? I had once a 486S (DX-2/66) and the S was for "SL Enhanced" which was some power saving feature. -- Jean-Louis Debert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 74 Annemasse France old Linux fan
- RE: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrake sub-optimiz... james.fogg
- RE: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrake sub-op... John Aldrich
- RE: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrake sub-op... Matt Stegman
- Re: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrake su... Jean-Louis Debert
- Re: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrak... John Connell
- RE: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrake su... John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrake su... Stephen F. Bosch
- Re: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrak... John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrake su... Tom Snell
- Re: [expert] Intel Chip Types (was) Mandrak... David Weiser
