Thank you...
"Brian T. Schellenberger" wrote:
>
> Well, the RFC's usually deal with transport format, not storage format.
> Nonetheless the basic data files *are* compatible, but Netscape makes
> extra files called ".foo.summary" for each mailbox "foo."
>
> If you update mailboxes with pine, netscape will get confused, but if
> you just wipe out the ~/nsmail/.*.summary files every time you finish
> with pine it should automatically re-generated them.
>
> Then it's just a matter of getting them to agree on the folder.
> Netscape is supposed to let you change the dir it uses but in my
> experience this does not work well. I'd either change it in pine or use
> a symbolic link.
>
> Not also that you may have an issue with different locations for
> inbox/outbox/sent mail.
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Somewhere, I read that NS' email client follows RFCblah.
> > Can these 2 share email folders? It sure would be handy to
> > be able to use them both...
--
123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Jefferson, LA USA WWW : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| |
| Most overused words: feel, cool/kewl, fun, myBlah.com |
| Most underused word: think |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
