On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 10:02:48AM -0500, Brash, Matthew wrote:
> Hmmm... why Kde? It's basically windows98 with more options... QT widget
> set is a resource hog...
Because, from my experience, the KDE & Qt people are the only ones really
using one Widget-Set and they keep a standard while doing so. If you look
at Windows xx, they impose their own standards (not open), and gnome uses
so many different approaches & programming languages, that both are very
resource hungry. If you have tried the KDE2 packages, you'll notice that a
lot has been done for speed improvement and a light environement. This is
what I call improved Technology. If any of the KDE developers reads this,
-> Congrats folks.
Regards
Smurphy
--
Remember, Grasshopper, falling down 1000 stairs begins by tripping over
the first one.
-- Confusion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Joerg Mertin : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Home)|
| in Neuch�tel/Schweiz : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)|
| Stardust's LiNUX System : http://www.solsys.org |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand : Data, Voice & Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP fingerprint: 6D E9 7B 04 57 7B 65 42 B7 7A D0 AA 69 95 7C E1
