I notieed that if I telnet to port 65535 on my machine, I almost get a
telnet prompt.  Here is what I get:

> telnet ad1440.net 65535
Trying 209.95.121.219...
Connected to ad1440.net.
Escape character is '^]'.

Then it sits there forever.   However, as far as I knew, I had nothing
supposed to be listening on port 65535.  So I decided to check out what
was listening on that port with

# fuser -n tcp local_port 65535
local_port/tcp: invalid specificiation
65535/tcp:           12463

# ps -alxww | grep 12268 | grep -v grep
  F   UID   PID  PPID PRI  NI   VSZ  RSS WCHAN  STAT TTY        TIME COMMAND
040     0 12463     1   0   0   852   24 wait_f S    ?          0:00 (kflushd)

So, it appears that kflushd is listening on port 65535 and returning an
almost-telnet prompt when connected to.  This does not seem normal to me.
Am I running a compromised kflushd?  Or do the parentheses around the
process name mean something?   I notice that I'm running 2 kflushd
processes, and that's possibly quite significant, but I'm not sure what
the brackets/parens around the process name mean.  Both have a parent
process of 1 (init)

# ps -alxww | grep kflushd | grep -v grep
  F   UID   PID  PPID PRI  NI   VSZ  RSS WCHAN  STAT TTY        TIME COMMAND
040     0     2     1   0   0     0    0 bdflus SW   ?         13:52 [kflushd]
040     0 12463     1   0   0   852   24 wait_f S    ?          0:00 (kflushd)

Does anyone have any clues what is going on?

==============================================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          S/W Developer       http://www.ad1440.net/~devnull 
==============================================================================
        Linux Viruscan:  Windows 95/98/NT Found Remove it ? (Y/y) 
==============================================================================
GCS/IT@ d? s+:++>: a30 C++++$ ULS++++$ P++ L++>+++ E W+++ N+ o? K- w O- M- V--
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5++ X+ R++ tv--@ b+++ DI++ D G e++ h----@(++) r+++() y++++*
                  (http://www.ebb.org/ungeek to decode)
==============================================================================

Reply via email to