Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> Hmmmmmmmm...maybe I should-a got the RPM instead. I downloaded and
> installed the netscape tarball and it made a royal mess! Nutscrape doesn't
> work at the moment cause there are bits and peices of the old and newer
> version here and there and the twain shall never meet! Damnit! should-a
> left well enough alone. It wasn't broke so why did i wanna fix it! geez I
> feel stupid!
>
> Thanks for letting me rant.
>
> --
> Mark
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ** =/\= |
> ** <_||_> |
> ** =\/= | Registered Linux user #182496
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, vern wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all for the lead on the Cooker server, I had
> > checked there a few days ago, but not lately. I see it
> > was uploaded on the 31st. so I didn't miss it by much.
> > So as you can plainly see my little header says 4.74 the
> > only thing I was looking for was the 128 bit encryption,
> > so I won't get highjacked buying Penguins on Ebay! :-)
> > vern
> >
> >
> > Charles Curley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 02:43:25PM -0400, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 11:21:03PM -0700, vern wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Vincent!
> > > > > On the way to cooker!
> > > >
> > > > Go get it, Vern... =)
> > > >
> > > > > Now have you got a line on that Carnivore source
> > > > > yet?? Then I'll be all set for Y2K!
> > > >
> > > > Carnivore? I think I'm missing something here...
> > >
> > > No, no, no. If you're luck, it's missing you. :-)
> > >
> >
> >
The tarball file from ftp.netscape.com worked here. I just uninstalled
the ML rpm's for the old Netscape before I installed from the netscape
version, and started netscape from it's new installation dir
/opt/netscape. Never had a problem with it.
Harry
--
_______________________________________
Harry Flaxman | Reg Linux User 182484
http://web.meganet.net/hflaxman
ICQ # 22086907 | Reg Linux System 80769
