As Inderstand it, there is very little difference between UDMA33 and UDMA66
when there is a single disk on the IDE channel.

Chris Slater-Walker

----- Original Message -----
From: "Xuejun Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 6:10 PM
Subject: [expert] Harddisk speed with UDMA66


> Hi,
>
> How is the ultimate harddisk performance with UDMA66? Although it
> works fine with UDMA66,but the harddisk performance is
> just like UDMA33 as below. The question is how to improve
> the speed up to 20M/sec or so. My mainboard is Abit BP6
> with HPT366, harddisk is IBM-DJNA-351520.
>
> Any suggestions will be most appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jun
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> [root@fsbbs liuxj]# hdparm -tT /dev/hde
>
> /dev/hde:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.79 seconds = 71.51 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.38 seconds = 14.61 MB/sec
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> The information of harddisk is,
> --------------------------------------------------------
> [root@fsbbs liuxj]# hdparm -i /dev/hde
>
> /dev/hde:
>
>  Model=IBM-DJNA-351520, FwRev=J56OA30K, SerialNo=G80GLWAQ332
>  Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
>  RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=34
>  BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=430kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
>  CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=30033360
>  IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
>  PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
>  DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 *udma4
> -----------------
> [root@fsbbs liuxj]# hdparm /dev/hde
>
> /dev/hde:
>  multcount    = 16 (on)
>  I/O support  =  1 (32-bit)
>  unmaskirq    =  0 (off)
>  using_dma    =  1 (on)
>  keepsettings =  1 (on)
>  nowerr       =  0 (off)
>  readonly     =  0 (off)
>  readahead    =  8 (on)
>  geometry     = 29795/16/63, sectors = 30033360, start = 0
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to