On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Jason Straight wrote:

> use gcc --version to get the version of gcc it matches the dir then.

        That's not the point.  Packages are labeled for a reason, and this
package is not.  It's just one in a string of sloppy things that are
related to 7.2.

> On Saturday 11 November 2000 18:01, you wrote:
> 
> > > 7.2 is listed to have
> >     # rpm -qa | grep gcc-2
> >     gcc-2.95.2-12mdk
> > yet there is a /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-mandrake-linux/2.95.3 and not a
> > 2.95.2 directory.  This might be the reason behind gcc failing 9 out of 10
> > times when attempting to compile programs manually.
> >
> > Compiling programs is a hit and miss with ld core'g when it feels like it
> > and gcc failing to work off and on.
> >
> > 7.2 needed to actually be 8.0  and thuroughly tested with all the new
> > idiotic LSB mandates that have been added along with the unofficial
> > patches to various programs the Linux-Mandrake has slipped in.
> >
> > It's also a shame that AfterStep wasn't included. :)
> >
> > --
> >
> > | d a v i d  @  m i h m
> > |     dmihm  @  swbell.net
> > | webmaster  @  afterstep.org
> > | ftpmaster  @  afterstep.org
> > |     dmihm  @  rchitecture.com
> >
> > --
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; name="message.footer"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Content-Description: 
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> -- 
> Jason Straight - NMO.net Senior Network Tech
> Penguinfarm.com - Personal Page
> http://www.penguinfarm.com/
> ICQ 1796276
> 
> 

--
| d a v i d  @  m i h m
|     dmihm  @  swbell.net
| webmaster  @  afterstep.org
| ftpmaster  @  afterstep.org
|     dmihm  @  rchitecture.com
--
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

Reply via email to