Chris Molnar's RPMs seem to be marked as 2.1 - AFAIK, there is not KDE
2.1 yet, and it makes me very worried to install them on my system,
especially when thewre may be a real 2.1 soemtime in the future, and the
version numbers will screw up dependencies.
Mike
------------------------------------------
Mike MacCana Support Consultant
C Y B E R S O U R C E
Level 9, 140 Queen St Melbourne 3000
Ph : +61 3 9642 5997 Fax: +61 3 9642 5998
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> I d/l'd the new 'official unsupported' KDE2.01 rpms as announced on
> http://www.mandrakeforum.com/article.php3?sid=20001209085323
> I first ran a 'rpm -Uvh --test' on them all at once and got back a
> slew of messages that the packages ( Chris Molnar's
> ftp://nebsllc.com/pub/KDE_UPDATE ) already installed were newer.
>
> Out of curiosity, and thinkin I was being none to smart, I forced an
> install of the Mdk 2.01 rpm's anyway. It was a big MISTAKE. The
> resulting KDE2.01 was a _downgrade_ from Chris' KDE2 upgrades, and
> introduced a few bugs as well (eg, kedit wouldn't run, I lost a lot of
> recent Konqueror bookmarks, etc.).
>
> .... needless to say I chalked my experiment up to user error, and
> have backed out the 2.01 rpms and reinstalled Chris' KDE2.01+ rpms.
> All is well again inspite of myself :)
> --
> Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay
>
>
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
