Weird. I *do* have /usr/bin/mh which seems to duplicate the contents of
/usr/bin, and both directories have mh -> ./ . A security thing maybe??
Dave.
On 29-Dec-2000 Larry Marshall wrote:
> Tom Eastman wrote:
>>
>> [tom@celleste bin]$ ls -ld /usr/bin/mh
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Dec 29 2000 /usr/bin/mh ->
>> ./
>>
>> Why is there a symlink in /usr/bin called mh which points straight back
>> to /usr/bin???
>>
>> Is this kind of recursive symlink a bad thing? or can I just ignore
>> it?
>
> Can't imagine why it's there or how it could be useful. For what it's
> worth, I have no such link on my system. Any idea what mh is or is
> supposed to be?
>
> Cheers --- Larry
