I have recently had to do another install: this time, not because I'd
messed up the OS, but to accomodate a CD-RW I was very happy to receive
for Xmas. I was reminded of a point which had struck me on an earlier
install, and would like someone from Linux-<andrake to comment.

My system is LM7.0 upgraded to 7.1 (Magazine cover disks) [+ P233MMX,
64MB RAM, and a total of 5GB had space].Because of the 'absence' of C++
header files on the 7.1 disk (subject of much correspondence a bit
back!), I install 7.0 and then upgrade to 7.1: This leaves me with a
useable C++ compiler. When it comes to specifying mount points, I
specify /dos for the main W98 partition (hda1) and /cd_buffer for a
750MB partition on hdb that is there for just what it says! [In fact, to
do the install, it is necessary due to problems with the CD-RW - I'm not
the only person to eccounter this, going by recent correspondence - I
copy the CD to my /cd_buffer from windows and do a pcmcia install from
hd] Comes to specify mount points: /dos - fine, /cd_buffer: I can't,
because the disk is in use - no hassle. When 7.0 is installed, /dos is
unused, and instead I have /mnt/windows.

If no notice is going to be taken of the mount point I specify, the WHY
ASK?

Similar procedure for upgrading to 7.1. and again, the mount points have
been changed. This time it's more drastic, because I've configured a few
programs to use my favoured settings. For Netscape I share the Mail
directory between Windows and all Linux 'users' - no security risk, I'm
the only person to use the machine, and the non-root users are just for
convenience. BUT, my default Inbox is no longer present, so Netscape
won't load. I also share the 'My Documents' directory between Windows
and all 'users', so I have problems there as well.

So I have, tediously and not completely without risk, to manually
reconfigure all the affected mount points.

WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO DO THIS? Would it be too much to ask the upgrade
program to parse fstab to see what's where - it obviously does for /home
and /usr/local.

I hope someone at Linux-Mandrake might be able to enlighten me.

As a futher, small, point, is there any reason why, following the
upgrade, programs such as joe and klyx - not on my LM7.1 disk, but
apparently on the extension CD - no longer appear on the menus, evenif I
run update-menus?

Ronnie Whipp.
============


Reply via email to