That was kind of my point for me and suse I couldn't get sound to go. I had
different issues with redhat and caldera, for me the Mandrake distributions
installed on all of my pc's with the least amount after install work. Again
like I mentioned earlier this was for me.
On Tuesday 06 February 2001 08:10, philomena wrote:
> I have an SBLive! card, and had no problem with SuSe and sound in 6.4
> and 7.0. I would download the current emu10k driver (not a patch, the
> actual driver)from creative, compile, and sound was beautiful. On the
> other hand, until Mandrake 7.2, I had tons of problems with Mandrake and
> sound - but, it does works fine now with 7.2. So, sound card results
> vary from from person to person, even with the same card, and you can't
> say that SuSe has no sound.
>
> philomena
>
> Jerry Sternesky wrote:
> > I couldn't get sound to work for my sound blaster live card when I tried
> > Suse 6.1, even with downloading the emu10k patch from creative. Yast or
> > what ever that thing was keep giving me grief when i tried to configure
> > it. I had that same sound card functioning under redhat before trying
> > suse. After I pulled suse, and installed Mandrake sound was there out fo
> > the gun. So I would have to agree with Vic on this one, for me suse had
> > no sound.
> >
> > On Tuesday 06 February 2001 01:28, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> > > Vic wrote:
> > > > If that is the case, then I pick RedHat, suse has no sound.
> > >
> > > Since we are just moving from SuSE to Mandrake, I obviously don't think
> > > that SuSE is better than Mandrake, but saying that it has no sound is
> > > utter nonsense.
> > >
> > > Andreas