Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
>
> [mdw1982@mdw1982 mdw1982]$ df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda5 494M 156M 338M 32% /
> /dev/hda8 7.3G 1.1G 6.2G 16% /home
> /dev/hda1 1.7G 1.4G 297M 82% /mnt/win_c
> /dev/hdc1 652M 161M 491M 25% /mnt/win_c2
> /dev/hdc5 1.8G 92k 1.8G 0% /mnt/win_d
> /dev/hda7 2.9G 2.1G 798M 73% /usr
> /dev/hdc6 787M 757M 30M 96% /var <-- the
critical readin
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> ...and du reports it this way:
>
> [root@mdw1982 mdw1982]# du -h --max-depth=1 /
> 1.5G /mnt
> 0 /net
> 512 /opt
> 4.0M /tmp
> 469M /var <-- the critical reading
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> What really has me stuck is the different readings I'm getting on /var.
> Can any shed a little light on this?
>
> Xwc calculated /var and came up with essentially the same answer as du
> did.
>
> thanks,
>
> Mark
> *****
Hey Mark, once upon a time I've used Win and Linux on
the same disk, and learned that FAT sucks...
I bet you problem resides on the FAT-EXT2-f.s. tools inte
raction...
Show us your /etc/fsck, plz?
--
Leonardo T. de Carvalho
Ibiz Tecnologia
Frase aleat�ria:
"No rock so hard but that a little wave
May beat admission in a thousand years.
-- Tennyson
"
