On Sat Dec 08, 2001 at 12:34:15PM -0600, David Wollmann wrote: > > > tetex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: MD5 GPG NOT OK > > > tetex-doc-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: MD5 GPG NOT OK > > > > > > > > > I haven't checked these files on other servers. > > > > > > Any chance we can get someone to check this out and see what the problem > > > is? > > > > I assume you have the security team gpg keys installed? (Of course > > you do, otherwise they would all fail). I know the files are fine > > because: > > > > (vdanen@logan: /mnt/updates/BIG/updates/7.1/RPMS)$ rpm --checksig tetex* > > tetex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > > tetex-afm-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > > tetex-doc-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > > tetex-dvilj-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > > tetex-dvips-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > > tetex-latex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > > tetex-xdvi-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > > (vdanen@logan: /mnt/updates/BIG/updates/7.1/RPMS)$ > > > > Can you do a "rpm --checksig -v" on the two packages and see exactly > > what fails? You may have had a bad download. > > I ran rpm with the verbose switch and the MD5 chksums are bad, _not_ > the signatures.
Try re-downloading the two files then. > I'll have a go with a couple other download methods and see if I can get > better results. Yup.. likely a bad download (off by one byte or something maybe which would still make the gpg sig valid). -- OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk uptime: 20 days 20 hours 50 minutes.
msg45920/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
