Windows ME was truly Microsoft's *worst* operating system.

Kindest Regards,
 Ashley (aka ze0).

|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Ashley Reynolds (aka ze0)            [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| http://www.botepidemic.com           Ph: +61 404 140 163 |
|                                                          |
|              Registered Linux User: #254073              |
|----------------------------------------------------------|

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Gary A. Garibaldi wrote:

> I installed Mandrake 8.1 in about 45 minutes since it became available and if
> I wouldn't have moved this pass week it would have been up for over 3 months
> with out a hitch. I can't say the same about WinME. I spent 12 hours
> yesterday with my son-inlaw getting his system reinstalled because of
> multi-virui. I had multiple problems with sound and modem, and only after
> searching the internet I found the drivers and was able to get the basic
> system installed. Today he is installing all the other programs that he uses.
>
> Gary
>
> On Monday 07 January 2002 16:06 pm, you wrote:
> > Marc wrote:
> > > Unstable??  Are you kidding?
> > >
> > > My windows installation had all kinds of problem not recoqnicing
> > > hardware, conflicting irq etc etc.  MDK 8.1  runs very smooth without any
> > > prblem at all. So MDK 8.1 is very stable.
> > >
> > >
> > > marc
> > >
> > > On Monday 07 January 2002 06:59 pm, you wrote:
> > >>On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Davor Cengija wrote:
> > >>> I'm having a really hard time with this new 8.1
> > >>> distribution. It is very unstable and unpredictable (something
> > >>> I wouldn't expect from Mandrake Linux). Anyone experienced
> > >>> similar problems, say:
> > >>>
> > >>>- kicker dies without obvious reason
> > >>>- konqueror segfaults with libstdc++ errors in debug stack trace
> > >>>- the X server freezes while the rest of the system works fine (say,
> > >>>  internet connection). However, mouse and keyboard are dead (since
> > >>>  they're controlled by X, of course)
> > >>>- xemacs segfaults with different errors, in different states
> > >>>
> > >>> There are some other problems as well. I'll skip pasting stack
> > >>> traces, etc for now.
> > >>>
> > >>> The strange thing is that everything works just fine after
> > >>> reboot (like in windows :-). So, I'd say that either kernel or
> > >>> some standard lib (glibc, libstdc++ or whatever) is
> > >>> broken. Sometimes one error in say konqueror is followed by
> > >>> xemacs' segfault.
> > >>
> > >>Check your hardware. This sounds suspiciously like a failing CPU or case
> > >>fan. I've been running 8.1 for about two months now and it has been
> > >>solid.
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> >
> > Are you using standard KDE from mandrake or the souped-up version that
> > does fast loads?  It sounds suspiciously like you have one of the
> > sensitive systems and you tried the second option.
> >
> > I have one 8.1 installation that would have four months uptime except
> > that I had to move its location from room to room and shut it down for
> > that purpose.  The only things giving me trouble are mozilla and
> > Aethera, which have to be killed periodically,  Others with some
> > interesting video cards or with video vs NIC IRQ conflicts have reported
> > some problems, but rarely.  One of the nice things about this distro is
> > that you can set PnP BIOS to yes with most machines, but you had better
> > set ACPI to "No"
> >
> > Civileme
>
>


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to