J. Craig Woods wrote:

>FemmeFatale wrote:
>
>>
>>I believe Civilme's exact words on Ext3 were:  An abortion waiting to
>>happen.  I quoteth. ;p
>>
>>Femme
>>--
>>
>
>Like so many different variations on your machine, filesytems should be
>made with reference to as many criteria as possible. Yes, speed is good
>but what if you go for speed and lose some function you might need? As a
>SA there are times I need to set file attributes. You know, a file gets
>deleted that should not have been deleted, etc. With file attribs, I
>have saved by butt many times. Ext3 will let me set file attributes, and
>reiserfs does not support them. My choice is not choice: I must go with
>ext2 or ext3. The bottom line is make choices based on what you need...
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>
Interesting thread I thought to post my troubles with XFS to.
When I installed md8.1 on my home system I went from reiserfs, which 
never gave me trouble, to using xfs which I knew from work having it on 
our Silicon Graphics machine. I also read a lot about it and for speed 
and features it seemed the best and having a high esteme for SGI I did 
not hesitate.

Nevertheless I've experienced about 4 times so far the following (I have 
an IDE system disk 'quantum fireball' of 8GB):
Every time there's a power cut I find a lot of files corrupted. Instead 
of their original contents they contain nothing but ^@ (viewed with vim) 
characters. The files concerned are e.g. all the KDE config files of 
apps that were open at the time of the power cut, but I once had inittab 
& message affected too. You can imagine that KDE wouldn't start after 
that in the 1st case and the whole system was fucked in the 2nd. This 
for me is totally unacceptable and I don't dare to imagine what this 
would mean for a company's production machine.

My technical knowledge in this field is not sufficiant enough to 
pinpoint what exactly is the cause: the version of xfs included in 8.1, 
the way f.s. are checked (or not checked) on boot-up? I don't know. I've 
read before that journaling file systems didn't need to be fsck'ed but 
why do you find a fsck for reiser & xfs then? Mar 25
All I see in the messages file is this :
22:57:40 gz kernel: Start mounting filesystem: ide0(3,6)
Mar 25 22:57:40 gz kernel: XFS: WARNING: recovery required on readonly 
filesystem.
Mar 25 22:57:40 gz kernel: XFS: write access will be enabled during mount.
Mar 25 22:57:40 gz kernel: Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: 
ide0(3,6) (dev: 3/6)
Mar 25 22:57:40 gz kernel: Ending XFS recovery on filesystem: ide0(3,6) 
(dev: 3/6)

I'd be glad to learn more around this from active users of xfs since I 
sure would like to remedy this 'russion roulete' situation.

See ya,
Guy.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to