On Sun, 07 Jul 2002 12:27:37 -0600 FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority
> dfox wrote: > > > > > And hardware that passes memtest86 may fail in a stressful session > > with gcc. :( Memtest is sequential and performs a selected set of > > tests on the memory, but it can't (or doesn't) simulate the somewhat > > random-like access to memory that gcc does. Then again, gcc doesn't > > randomly 'walk' all over your whole memory space, but only a small > > subsection of it. > > > > > >> Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas > > > > > > OK insert dumb question here: But wouldn't running SETI For a week > straight 24/7 have this nice burn-in effect on a CPU? > > Femme Because (as I understand it) SETI tries specifically not to stress your box... It, like most programs attempts to play nice and not break things. James > > > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
