On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 22:39 -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:

> Don't forget the TI and the one I wrote my first piece of code on ...
> the HP-45  RPM programmable Calculator.  (more fun than the mainframe...
> it took forever to write, debug and view output from a program it was
> boring.... the 45 however gave me instant results.)
> 
> James

No. In modern times you sit there and code for a certain time, say 1
hour. Then you run the stuff through your compiling routine and see the
result. You curse for a certain time, do your head-bangs-against-wall
and start all over.

In those times with the mainframe you sat there for some days or weeks
and coded, writing the code on in forms using a pencil. Then you gave
all the stuff to a data typist and waited a couple of days to get your
cards punched. Meanwhile you relaxed in your favourite watering hole.

During these days you went to the white coats and begged for computer
time to run your program. Then after much begging and kneeling on the
floor you got a schedule and waited another week.

Then, on a beautiful Saturday evening you come to the holy chapel (aka
the computer department) and the operator loads the stacks of cards
with your program.

Your program does not work like you thought it would.

After debugging for 2 months you finally find out that your coding was
ok but the data typist had a flue and each sneeze spoiled the card she
was working on at the moment. So your program could not work.

Now isn't that far from boring?

wobo
-- 
"... and anyway, an html can't carry a virus." (Aug 2001, Usenet)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]     ICQ: #128612867      GPG-ID: A69882EE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ISDN4LINUX-FAQ -- Deutsch: http://www.wolf-b.de/i4l/i4lfaq-de.html

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to