no, i had the same problem when i installed. wonder if putting /root in after / may be the culprit? never has been before, though.
--- Original Message --- From: Randy Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] root >Hmm, I just installed 9.0 a few days ago, on two machines, and each with >a separate /root partition. Seemed to work fine. (In both cases, the >/root partition is (1) a primary partition, and (2) physically before >the / partition (i.e., /root has a lower hda "number").) > >Am I misunderstanding the question, or ? > >Randy Kramer > >On Tuesday 08 October 2002 03:02 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: >> Norman Zhang wrote on Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:41:54AM -0700 : >> > In 8.2 I can creat a /root partition on its own, but in 9.0 I can >> > longer do that. When I try, I get a prompt telling me that /root >> > should be with the root partition. Can I still create /root on its >> > own? If not why not? Thanks. >> >> Heavily discussed on the Cooker mailing list. The answer is that the >> FHS doesn't require /root to be on the / partition, but it is >> recommended that it be. If the user chooses to override it, he can >> make it a symlink or a seperate mount. The 9.0 installer will not >> let you do it, but the 9.1 installer will. >> >> Blue skies... Todd > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
