Suggestions for Mandrake 9.1
5. I don't know... I like some new stuff to play with, I'd prefer they were
made an option and then put in a "beta" or "experimental" menu option.
doing that helps the developers because they will likely get more bug
reports... if no-one ran beta stuff, it would stay beta stuff..
I have been stung by beta bugs many many times, but I still like to play.

4. I suppose the installer could get a new look, but it works, so I don't
really care.. and most newbies will be seeing it for the first time anyway.

3. This one I agree with.. popular opinion seems to be that the qt libs are
better then gtk anyway. so I don't know why mandrake choose gtk.

1. I think that would be good as an option, but I think a more comprehensive
mandrake theme for kde would be better...and easier. (and you can turn it
off.)

2. I don't mind the current one, they shouldn't remove it, just make a newer
alternative and let people choose..

rgds


Franki
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:expert-owner@;linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of Craig Williamson (ENZ)
  Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 5:59 AM
  To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  Subject: [expert] Suggestions for Mandrake 9.1


  Hi All,

          With the hype finally dying down from the current round of distro
releases I thought I would add my two cents into the pool for the next
version of Mandrake.

          1.  With Redhat 8.0 and Suse8.1, both companies have greatly
enhanced the user experience with Gnome and KDE respectively.  Mandrake
should do something special with KDE.  For example, redesign the kmenu.
Make it more appealing to the end user.  Throw around the ideas from
kde-look.org for the kmenu and 'Mandrakeize' it :-).  What about something
completely different like a pie-menu.  That would really bring the
experience up another notch.

          2.  Create some window dressings (decorations) that say that this
is a Mandrake OS (Suse style).  Work on the font rendering (xft2/fontconfig)
and/or create some useable fonts.  The default blue style that Mandrake
seems to use is getting boring now.  Develop some new graphics
(crystallized?) for your core Mandrake apps rather than custom icons.

          3.  With the RandR extension hopefully coming to the next release
of Mandrake, some of the Control Centre will be made redundant.  Redesign it
for QT/KDE based rather than GTK based.  Mandrake is a KDE-pro company, are
they not?  I'm not sure on the politics why they decided to go the GTK way,
but they should really concentrate on one desktop/toolkit and improve that
(lycoris like?).

          4.  For me, the installer is looking outdated.  So how hard is it
to change the aesthetics of it.  The under-the-hood stuff is still top
notch, but the GUI is looking old and unchanged for the last few releases.

          5.  The package support really get me personally.  Why do they
include pre-release/beta versions of software in the OFFICIAL stable
release.  Mandrake 9.1 should only concentrate on released versions of
packages.   That is where the reliability and security problems come in.

          I hope this starts something.  If you guys don't like my ideas,
say so.  Mention your ideas and see if it makes it into the next release.
For me Mandrake seems to be losing its focus.  It started off as redhat with
KDE, but now is trying to be a Jack of all trades.  And is now a Master of
None.  I'll throw around some solutions to my ideas somehow.  Thanks for
reading this.  I hope I haven't bored you too much ;-).

  Craig


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to