On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 15:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > <snip>
> > <Rant>
> > Building an RPM should NOT be dependent upon noncritical issues like documents 
> > or other nonintegral froo-froo.  Perhaps Mandrake could FIX Redhat's broken 
> > RPM by making it more fault tolerant so that rpm builds can be completed 
> > inspite of missing or failing a noncritical portion (like doc generation)?!
> > </Rant>
> 
> I dunno if I can agree with that. One thing I like about RPM is that
> it makes it easy to reproduce an identical package from the SRC rpm. If
> it continued then there's too much room for error when publishing an
> RPM. 

Shouldn't the requirements/deps for building the src rpm generate an a
warning before it starts building.

Alternativly you can install the source rpm and do a "rpm -bp
specfile.spec" and build from the tarball as per normal.
-- 
Alex Bennee
Senior Hacker, Braddahead Ltd
The above is probably my personal opinion and may not be that of my
employer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to