On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 17:12 -0600, Vox wrote:
>
> Since it seems like comparisons with debian are in vogue lately in
> the mdk community, here goes another one :)
>
> cooker = unstable
> mandrake linux = testing
> corporate server = stable
>
> With cooker you are in the bleeding edge and hunt the bugs. Changes hourly.
> With mandrake linux, you get a very usable system for all desktops
> and small servers, and get to hunt the non-critical bugs
> left. Changes every 6 months, bugfixes between.
> With corporate server you get the rock-stable box for a monster
> critical server, no/extremely few bugs. Change every couple of
> years, bugfixes between.
>
> What do you think about that? :)
IMHO that tells it roughly.
cooker for the geek - no $$$ but great help for the distro
mandrake linux for the user - few $$$ but nagging all the time
corposerv for the *real* work - demanding but brings the $$$
(Don't take that too serious)
wobo
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
