Sorry- this was meant to be sent to directly Con Kolivas- Apparently, I messed up and it somehow appeared on the expert list, addressed to myself- still can't figure that one out.
Robert C. On Thursday 26 June 2003 19:51, you wrote: > Con, > Tried the new june23 full patch, but couldn't get past make modules. I then > edited my .config file some, and did the base patch, plus the performance > patches, and supermount, all individually, and that worked out great. Must > have been some conflict caused by the old .config. > > Anyway, my question is about setting the Variable Hz- do you mean when I do > xconfig, I should change the setting in General setup to a higher value, > and see if performance is improved? Here's my present value, that > apparently is the default. Or, is that what we're even talking about? I'm > not sure I understand this, due to lack of knowledge. > > # General setup > # > CONFIG_HZ=200 > > On your webpage I read: > > Is 1000Hz more overhead than 100Hz? Yes definitely, but not a great deal. > If you change the Hz, use a multiple of 100. There really is no point going > above 1000 Hz. > > I assume this means that if I'm correct and you are referring to that line > in xconfig, I can experiment. Am I also correct in that I need your patch > in order to experiment with this value? Or, am I totally misunderstanding > all of the above, and the ck3 patches already set some other value to > 1000Mhz that I'm confusing with the line in the kernel .config file? > > Thanks for the great patches- I'm now using 2.4.21 with CK patches > exclusively on MDK 9.1- nothing works better for my desktop box. > > Best regards, > Robert Crawford
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
