HI
try adding to rc.local at the end of the file
/sbin/route add -host 192.168.0.2 eth1
/sbin/route add -host 192.168.0.3 eth2
HTH 
Richard

On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 20:59, Steven Broos wrote:
> Quick lesson in subnetworking, because I think the problem isn't your
> IPtables-settings but your network layout.
> 
> 192.168.0.x is a class C network address. 192.168.0 is the network
> address, and the last number is the host-portion of the address.
> If all PCs have an address beginning with 192.168.0 and a netmask of
> 255.255.255.0 they are on the same subnet, and don't need routing.
> If you need to separate your LAN into difefrent subnets, use 192.168.0.x
> and 192.168.1.x etc...
> 
> Creating a subnet with mask 255.255.255.255 isn't possible, because that
> way you don't have any broadcast/network-addresses.
> 
> If you think this goes into the right direction, please give more
> details about your LAN and ask for more information :-)
> 
> regards,
> Steven
> (CCNA)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 20:47, SainTiss wrote:
> > Well, what I *need* e.g. on the gateway is something like this:
> > 
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> > Iface
> > 192.168.0.3     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0
> > eth2
> > 192.168.0.2     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0
> > eth1
> > 213.118.248.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.252.0   U     0      0        0
> > eth0
> > 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0
> > lo
> > 0.0.0.0         213.118.248.1   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
> > eth0
> > 
> > However, by default those upper 2 rules aren't there, and instead
> > there's a rule like this:
> > 
> > 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0 U    0      0       
> > 0   eth2
> > 
> > So in other words, by default ALL LAN traffic is routed through eth2,
> > while obviously traffic with 192.168.0.2 should be routed via eth1.
> > 
> > Did that make it any clearer?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Hans
> > 
> > On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 20:18, Bill Mullen wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, SainTiss wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I just changed my network configs here, and it seems the routing table
> > > > got messed up...
> > > > 
> > > > I know the solution (ie adding some rules and deleting some), but I was
> > > > wondering if there was some file or something where I could specify the
> > > > right rules, so that the table is setup correctly at boot?
> > > > 
> > > > what's the default way to do this? I'm guessing some file which is then
> > > > processed by ifup or something, but I'm not sure...
> > > 
> > > Depends on what's messed up. :)
> > > 
> > > Most settings draw on the information in the "/etc/sysconfig" directory, 
> > > specifically the "network" file and the various "ifcfg-<interface>" ones 
> > > in the "network-scripts" subdirectory. For simpler setups, these are all 
> > > you'll need to adjust, but we have no idea how complicated your normal 
> > > routing table actually is ... care to offer a hint? ;)
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
richard bown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to