Am Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 19:26 schrieb James Sparenberg: > On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 08:15, Felix Miata wrote: > > Finally got around to my first 9.1 install last night, and I'm > > personalizing configuration now. I did clean install using existing > > /home rather than updating 9.0, as I never did figure out how to make > > 9.0 boot in under 4 minutes, and didn't want whatever was wrong to cause > > that to survive the upgrade. > > > > This is the first install I've done where doing the updates at the end > > offered a new kernel. I checked that yes. When done, I found that the > > new kernel 2.4.21-0.25 became an alternate choice in the Grub menu > > instead of replacing 2.4.21-0.13 as the default. Is there any reason I > > shouldn't want 0.25 to be the default? > > not if it's working right for you. My understanding is that it's done > this way to allow choice, not force it. I'm running my own build of > 25mdk here without a hitch.
Nope. Afaik its a bit more confusing. The entry linux will boot the new kernel and the 25-entry is additional to that, booting in the new kernel too. Putting the update under entry linux and add an entry for the old kernel would be more consistent. Steffen
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
