How weird. Oh well, at least it's fixed now. On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 01:10, Jim C wrote: > Turns out, it's a kernel bug. Probably introduced by the patch itself. > > >On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 01:02, Jim C wrote: > > > > > >>...> > >> > >> > >>>table nat, append a rule, eth0_masq source of 192.168.1.0/24 destination > >>>any, action masquerade. > >>> > >>>Uh-oh, that doesn't make any sense. Perhaps the intent was to use -i in > >>>order to specify an interface? eth0_masq is clearly one of your > >>>interface names. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>I'll lay odds that you are correct and see if I can make some changes > >>but do you have any idea why it works with a regular Mandrake kernel? > >>Doesn't that seem odd? > >> > >> > >... > > > >only thing I can think of is a module patch that assumes interface if > >one isn't passed, which seems unlikely. I'd look at rpm -V shorewall, > >maybe uninstall and reinstall it. > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > >Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
