On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, rikona wrote: > They looked OK, so I sent it. It was done with a quick and dirty script > I wrote. Apparently the script was a bit too dirty. :-) This email > implements the same result with a different script. Is this better? > (They again look OK here.)
Sorry about the blank reply, I hit the wrong key ... <embarrased grimace> Well, it's an improvement, as at least the address is now correct. The placing of the name in the To: header, overriding what the OP had there, is still a bit disconcerting though (notice how it was picked up by Pine for use in the reply - because the address is the same as appears in the Reply-To: - so it looks as if I'm replying to myself), but it could be argued that I'm just a curmudgeon as regards this sort of thing. :) -- Bill Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] MA, USA RLU #270075 MDK 8.1 & 9.0 "Listen, here's the thing. If you can't spot the sucker in your first half hour at the table, then you *are* the sucker." - Mike McDermott
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
