Maybe using shared memory for video card and RAM?

El lun, 29-09-2003 a las 21:32, Felix Miata escribi�:
> Thomas Backlund wrote:
>  
> > From: "Felix Miata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > > > Felix Miata wrote:
> 
> > > > > Why is this file size 148180K, when all other files in /proc are size
> > 0?
> > > > > I'm in runlevel 3 no less.
> 
> > > > kcore is not a real file but is an image of your memory. Do an 'ls -lh
> > > > /proc/kcore' and it should match your physical RAM size. It's not taking
> > > > up any space on your disks.
> 
> > > #ls -lh /proc/kcore
> > > -r-------- 1 root root 145M Sep 29 14:12 /proc/kcore
> 
> > > But my installed RAM is 128M. Why the 17M difference? Do I have a memory
> > > leak problem? Is the 17M swapspace in use?
>  
> > Possibly...
>  
> > do a free -m and you'll see the mem usage...
> 
> free -m shows the same as top, 24000K swap in use. Neither explain the
> 17M discrepancy.
> -- 
> "...[B]e quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry...."
>                                                 James 1:19 NIV
> 
>  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
> 
> Felix Miata  ***  http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
> 
> 
> ----
> 

> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
           Diego  Dominguez                 
              __/\__  
             |      | 
 Andalucia  /        \  Spain
            \        /
             |__  __| 
                \/    



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to