T. Ribbrock wrote:
> *Why* does this list have a Reply-To, anyway? To me, a Reply-To set to
> the list always seemed a rather stupid idea, as it makes the default to
> reply to the list
Exactly as it should. This is a public discussion list, not a public
question, private reply list. If replies aren't public, 1-the public
doesn't know any exist; 2-the public can't correct bad replies; 3-there
is no discussion, just one side of "a conversation".
--
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom...."
Proverbs 9:10 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
