OK, I see why this didn't show up on the list. Please, also, read about setting reply-to in the wiki: http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette

Rolf Pedersen wrote:
Bill Dearing wrote:

On Wednesday 22 October 2003 17:15, Greg Meyer wrote:

I think the official 9.2 release should be delayed a little for these
things to get fixed. Experienced
users should have no problems fixing these install isues, but for new
users it would be a big dissapointment.


Unfortunately, it is too late. FiveStar has been sent to the manufacturer.



What a shame. So far, for me, this is the worst Mandrake version I've seen in years.

[..]



I next tried downloading the ISO's again, and reburn them, figuring this could all be a problem in the user space (me!). Nope. After a second install with new ISO's on new CD's I hit the the same snag again. Bummer.

[..]


There are ways to verify the isos and, even, verify the burned CDs. It is better to do this than to guess that going through all the effort of downloading and burning will produce something better than the first time. Even though bittorrent is supposed to perform checks of the downloaded data, some people seemed to wind up with bad isos and the md5sums were published in various posts to the Club articles. It's imperative to know the download is verified good before anything else. Next, there is a bit of neat HOWTO on verifying the burned disk by Pierre Fortin on the wiki: http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/BurningCDsFromISOs

Rolf




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to