Hi Bryce,
Thanks for the offer. I've made some good progress, so maybe a sprint won't be
needed...
I've made further attempts at building with 3.8, and I think I now have a VM
that works.
Running ExuperyStoryTests, gives...
288 run, 284 passes, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 4 errors, 0 unexpected
passes
all errors are due to missing classes
Evaluating - ExuperyBenchmarks new run - gives these numbers...
arithmaticLoopBenchmark 2459 compiled 270 ratio: 9.107
bytecodeBenchmark 4317 compiled 1237 ratio: 3.490
sendBenchmark 3576 compiled 1782 ratio: 2.007
doLoopsBenchmark 2231 compiled 1711 ratio: 1.304
largeExplorers 2299 compiled 2358 ratio: 0.975
compilerBenchmark 1956 compiled 2103 ratio: 0.930
Cumulative Time 13066.194 compiled 5503.701 ratio 2.374
Is it safe to assume that everything is working o.k.?
Are there any other tests that need running? (I ran ExuperyTests, in the
TestRunner but it didn't do anything)
Cheers,
Andy
"Bryce Kampjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Andrew Tween writes:
> > > It's possible. Let me know how you get on. If it looks like the main
> > > show stopper for your Win 32 work then I'll upgrade to 3.9 and the
> > > latest VMMakers after finishing the size primitive. I've been meaning
> > > to do that at some point anyway. The new squeak-dev images look nice.
> >
> > ok, good. I'll do the porting work on linux, and call on your help when I
get
> > problems. And then move back to the Win32 build.
>
> If you run into problems, we could organise a day long sprint
> somewhere around London. I've got a car so could drive up your
> way or we could try to find space that's central.
>
> Bryce
_______________________________________________
Exupery mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
