Jason Johnson writes: > What is the impact of this move? Is it lesspower then continuations?
It allows ExuperyContext's to deoptimise themselves before they're serialised. Otherwise there's a risk that the code cache is cleared while the continuation is suspended. If it's then re-instated it'll refer to machine code that may not be there. The catch is Seaside stores all the state of a context in a collection then stuffs it back into the context. There's no catch. Contexts in continuations will be interpreted but then they're living from web page to web page so are unlikely to need to be compiled anyway. Bryce _______________________________________________ Exupery mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
