On 12/3/05, Gabriel Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 08:56 -0500, John Russell wrote: > > Would there be any problem with having the same modified behavior > > rotated pictues as Processed ones? Thanks. > > This bug is already in bugzilla: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301819 > > I can see that with the way F-Spot stores multiple versions (by just > storing copies of the entire file) having it save rotated photos as new > versions could take up a lot of space on peoples' machines who wouldn't > really want that to happen. Perhaps it could be a preference? > > Peace, > > Gabriel Burt > >
After Larry explained to me that rotated pictures have their EXIF header updated with the appropriate rotation i think that f-spot does it exactly right. Now that I have flickr configured to obey the EXIF rotation direction everything works great. If anything gthumb and eog need to be fixed to do the same now IMHO. _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
