On 05/10/06, Warren Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dotan Cohen wrote: > > On 04/10/06, Warren Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think we need to make it easy for the user to decide whether each term > >> should be AND/OR and not try to guess which one they want. I've added a > >> number of top level tags, and I wouldn't always want 'AND' to be used > >> across them. > > > > That's why I mentioned that the user could define the behaviour inside > > each top-level tag. Explaination below. > > I don't think that's enough... what I mean is that whether I use > AND/OR has relatively little to do with the top-level category the tags > are in. I agree that it's probably *more* likely that AND is the right > choice between top-level categories and OR within a category - but there > are definitely times where that isn't the right choice - and it'd be > nice if there's a way to get the opposite behaviour without having to go > to the advanced search... > > > Yes, it might be confusing to have different behaviour for different > > conditions. A simple default of AND might then be best. > > I doubt it... I expect that on average, OR will be the right guess > more often - that's the behaviour we have now, basically... > > > 1) In the Edit Tag dialog of a top-level tag, there could be a > > checkbox that makes searches within the top-level tag revert to OR > > behaviour. Additionally, in the Preferences there could be an option > > to have searches across top-level tags revert to OR as well. > > I think this would be pretty confusing to the naive user... > > > 2) Just have everything AND, and when users want something more > > powerful, they can fire up the Advanced Search dialog. There's a patch > > for that, that worked rather well I believe. > > I think this would be moderately un-useful... most useful queries need > a mix of AND/OR - forcing the user to go to the dialog to get both > AND/OR would be annoying... > > It seems like a hybrid solution might be best - default to AND between > top level categories and OR within them, but provide a relatively easy > way to switch that default on the fly (modifier key, RMB menu, something > like that)
This sounds backwards. I think that you meant OR between top level categories, and AND within them. > With the current 'OR' based filtering, I find I miss NOT almost as often > as I miss AND... providing a way to do that easily also would be > fantastic... > So what way do you propose to do that? You say that you want it done easily, without using an advanced dialog. What UI solution do you propose? Dotan Cohen http://lyricslist.com _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
