On 11/1/06, Peter Finley wrote: > Add some code to automatically detect converted RAW files during the import > process. For instance, say there is a RAW file called 'img_0001.cr2'. Most > often a file converted from this will retain the same base filename, such as > 'img_0001.jpeg'. During the import process, this could be detected and the > JPEG file could be automatically added as a version of the RAW file. Again, > this suffers from the same limitation of #2.
I have a very bad feeling about this approach. Let's have a look at workflow. At what stage do you want JPEG? 1. When you want to send files to photolab? 2. When you want to export photos to Flickr/PicasaWeb/etc.? 3. At some other stage? If [1] and/or [2], how much sense does it have to keep JPEG around _all the time_? If photos could be processed non-destructively and shown in processed form in F-Spot, would you still want having JPEG around or would you be happy with possibility to easily export processed originals with required settings (print/web) on demand? Maybe it's about time to hear from all F-Spot users who shoot to RAW what workflow is ideal for them? Alexandre _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
