My 0.02$ about this topic:

Making F-Spot able to adapt to:
  * custom directory structure
  * custom filenames
  * versionning scheme (custom merging of 2+ pictures as versions for
example)
would be a great plus for users.  F-Spot now has some nice defaults, but
those defaults might not fit some users needs.  Any easy way we can get to
make F-Spot more flexible is to be considered, IMO.

For example, I had to rebuild my whole photo database, from a previously
F-Spot managed directory structure that contained some
  * RAW pictures
  * JPEG ones (developed from RAW)
  * JPEG versionned ones derived from the above (with GIMP for example)
  * some PNG ones.

I had great trouble (and still have) managing my new database, because
  * there is no easy way to re-merge versions of my pictures
  * PNG files do not carry EXIF, which places them in the wrong yyyy/mm/dd
folder, based on modification date.

This is just one example of a situation in which a more flexible F-Spot
would be appreciated.

I must say, tho, that I still can't imagine managing my pictures without
F-Spot, keep on guys!



2009/5/12, Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]>:
>
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 01:08 +0000, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
> > Michael Wayne Goodman <goodman.m.w <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > A while ago I wrote a patch to allow customization of the directory
> > > structure of imported items, which Alessio Gaeta graciously updated.
> > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329040
> > >
> > > Is such behavior (if not this patch) going to be included in the
> > > import process?
> >
> > IMHO, this is the most missing feature f-spot has so far. Keep up the
> good work!
>
> I'd argue that true shared/multi-user/machine access to the database and
> photos repository is more in demand than the above.
>
> Who really cares how the photos are stored if one is always using f-spot
> to access them?  IMHO, you were not meant to go trawling through the
> structure that f-spot creates and if you need to, for whatever reason,
> then a feature is missing from f-spot.
>
> b.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> F-spot-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
F-spot-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list

Reply via email to